He can still just take a 31 minutes lunch .He is in a 45 minute lunch state.
He can still just take a 31 minutes lunch .
I’m in a 6 hour state but you would still get a second break at 7 hours.8 hours as in 12-8 or 8 hours plus :45? If its 12-8 you shouldnt get a second break, thats only 7 hours 15 mins. One 15 min break plus one lunch. At least around here that's how it should be
Bullshit. It’s not a violation if he/she takes a 31 minutes . I do it all the time I live in CA. He/she can’t clock in in 30 minutes . But 31 minutes it is not a violationThat would be a meal violation in CA. If you are given 45 minutes for lunch don't clock back in early.
You said it was a meal compliance violation , I’m letting you know that it is not .Not was I was told but ok.
Payroll is calculated based on a 45 minute lunch. If you work 5 days and do that you get paid for an extra hour and a quarter. Not a big deal if it's just you, but if the whole store does it payroll is blown. At my store if you do this you are talked to. I heard a srtl and hr talking about it when the srtl was clocking in under 45 minutes.
You said it was a meal compliance violation , I’m letting you know that it is not .
What your etl is saying is that he doesn’t want to pay you for 30 minutes of work because you clock in early . I do it all the time because i have to much shit to do , and I never clock out on time which put me in overtime pretty much everyday .Got it. It was the wording my etl used so I was going by that.
Bullshit. It’s not a violation if he/she takes a 31 minutes . I do it all the time I live in CA. He/she can’t clock in in 30 minutes . But 31 minutes it is not a violation