Archived Target security officer fired after reporting shoplifting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
32
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...d6f606-0854-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html

Dallas Northington spent nearly eight years working for Target in loss prevention, roaming the stores and scanning the surveillance cameras. In an episode at the Leesburg Target store in May that he said was typical, a man was allegedly captured twice on video shoplifting, and Northington responded as he said he always did: He called the Leesburg police, made a report and provided them the videos of the two incidents.

But the man in the video may have been a Fairfax County sheriff’s deputy, Northington said he soon learned. And within days, two things happened: The deputy retired from the sheriff’s office and Target fired Northington, 29, a married father of two with a third child on the way.

Northington said Target officials told him that he had violated procedure by not filling out the proper paperwork before contacting the police, though he said his office had operated the same way for years. He said he also was told that he had been insubordinate for not seeking approval before calling police, though he said the standard practice was for him to act as needed.

But the man Northington said he and his supervisors identified as a deputy has not yet been charged with a crime though Northington said he had provided the man’s name and two color videos of him in action, his face clearly visible, to Leesburg police on May 27, the date of the second incident.

A Leesburg police spokesman said investigators were still trying to confirm the suspect’s identity. Northington said Leesburg police typically filed similar cases against shoplifters within a few days. He also said a Leesburg police sergeant investigating the case said while watching the surveillance video on May 27 that he recognized the man from a local gym where the two worked out. Store supervisors also knew the man, Northington said.


Northington said he is considering his legal options. “I’m confused and don’t understand why,” Northington said. “I’ve been there for eight years, no issues. I’m just trying to provide for my family, and I just really want to get back to work.”

Molly Snyder, a corporate spokeswoman for Target, said in an e-mail that she would not discuss the details of the case for privacy reasons. But in Northington’s case, she said, “we have conducted a full investigation and don’t believe there is any merit to this individual’s claims.”

Declan Leonard, Northington’s attorney, said he typically represents employers in such disputes, but “when we heard how he was treated by Target, we decided to step in.”

Leonard said Northington “intends to fight Target on this for as long as it takes.”

Northington said that in his role as an assets-protection specialist for Target, he had summoned the Leesburg police numerous times in recent years to investigate shoplifters and had done so without filling out any paperwork or seeking permission from a supervisor.

In the first alleged shoplifting, on May 16, Northington said, he arrived at work and his supervisor said he had noticed the man stick a tube of toothpaste into a bag after already paying for other items. He said the supervisor “didn’t feel comfortable” confronting the man, who the supervisor “thought was some sort of law enforcement.”

Northington said the store manager was contacted and the manager said he knew the man because they had participated in an NCAA March Madness pool together. The staff watched the surveillance video and decided, as they often did, Northington said, to wait for the man to return.


The man who Northington said appeared to be the deputy did not return a call seeking comment. The Washington Post is withholding his name because he has not been charged.

Northington said that when he clocked in on May 27, the supervisor told him the man had returned. That time, according to Northington, video appeared to show the man with a cart full of items at the pharmacy register inside the store but paying just for about half of them while concealing the cart from the cashier. After checking out, Northington said, the man wheeled away and stashed the rest of his merchandise, which Northington could not see, into the bags of purchased items and left.

Again, Northington said, the supervisor said he “didn’t feel comfortable” confronting the man, so the supervisor called Leesburg police and Northington went to the police station to file a report. A Leesburg sergeant then returned to the store, watched the video and said, “I know who that is,” Northington said. He said the sergeant also told him, “This is pretty serious” because the man was allegedly in law enforcement. Leesburg police confirmed that Northington had filed a police report on May 27. The Post did not independently review the video.

Soon after, Northington said, the supervisor told him the man’s full name. Northington said he phoned it in to the Leesburg police. It is unclear how the supervisor knew the man’s name.

On May 30, Northington said, he was called into the store’s personnel office and suspended for two days. The next week, he said, he was terminated for “gross misconduct.” He said he was told he had violated a policy on confidentiality by contacting police without approval, providing the surveillance video to police and not filling out internal paperwork before doing so.

“In my eight years, I’ve never had to call anyone to give out the video or to call police,” Northington said. “I have never seen any policy about contacting law enforcement.”

Lt. Jeff Dube of the Leesburg police confirmed that Northington had served as the complainant in an unknown number of cases with Leesburg police in the past. He said investigators “haven’t positively identified this guy. They’re still doing follow-up investigation.” He said he did not know why the case had taken so long to resolve but said “there might be some extenuating circumstances.”



Thoughts?
 
Wow...it sounds like there's one issue with what Northington did..."stashed the rest of the merchandise, which Northington could not see..."

From what I understand ap wise, this means they have no case, because there is a possibility the stuff was dumped and not stashed. But it seems pretty fishy to me!
 
It goes with the rumors I am hearing that the upper management does not want apprehensions. My store yours may vary.
 
That store is in my turf. I would suggest highly to fight it. I would start calling other etl's from other stores for starters. Based on info, looks ok.
 
It differs by state but in my state if merchandise that has not been purchased is placed in a bag then that is considered concealment and is grounds for immediate apprehension.
 
Interesting. Solely based on the information provided in the article, it doesn't look too good for Target on this one.

Whether the TM actually witnessed concealment or not (the wording isn't quite precise), it would seem that the APS was fired for violating a non-existent policy. APS are not required to obtain permission from a next level supervisor to file a police report. Furthermore, I am unsure as to what the "necessary paperwork" would be that one would have to complete before providing video to law enforcement. Unless there's a Virginia specific policy, there is none.

That said, it would be interesting to see what policies are listed in the termination document. Typically they must be pasted word for word into the document and then there will be a paragraph below explaining how and when they were violated.
 
Dallas Northington spent nearly eight years working for Target in loss prevention, roaming the stores and scanning the surveillance cameras. In an episode at the Leesburg Target store in May that he said was typical, a man was allegedly captured twice on video shoplifting, and Northington responded as he said he always did: He called the Leesburg police, made a report and provided them the videos of the two incidents.

But the man in the video may have been a Fairfax County sheriff’s deputy, Northington said he soon learned. And within days, two things happened: The deputy retired from the sheriff’s office and Target fired Northington, 29, a married father of two with a third child on the way.

Northington said Target officials told him that he had violated procedure by not filling out the proper paperwork before contacting the police, though he said his office had operated the same way for years. He said he also was told that he had been insubordinate for not seeking approval before calling police, though he said the standard practice was for him to act as needed.

But the man Northington said he and his supervisors identified as a deputy has not yet been charged with a crime though Northington said he had provided the man’s name and two color videos of him in action, his face clearly visible, to Leesburg police on May 27, the date of the second incident.

A Leesburg police spokesman said investigators were still trying to confirm the suspect’s identity. Northington said Leesburg police typically filed similar cases against shoplifters within a few days. He also said a Leesburg police sergeant investigating the case said while watching the surveillance video on May 27 that he recognized the man from a local gym where the two worked out. Store supervisors also knew the man, Northington said.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/local...d6f606-0854-11e4-bbf1-cc51275e7f8f_story.html

Hey it's been a while...

Basically: Target fires AP TM because he caught a cop.
 
Would you be able to clarify this case?

I'm not going to speak to much of AP, because of confidentiality but what was the position of the security officer TPS or Sr TPS? If the security officer was a TPS, and not certified to make apprehensions, hence (physical/law enforcement apprehensions) then that's a reason to get terminated; I've seen this before at my Target. Target's AP directives is specific and unrelentless.

Forget the clarification: I read commiecorvus link. Just egregious what happen to the AP team member.
 
Would you be able to clarify this case?

I'm not going to speak to much of AP, because of confidentiality but what was the position of the security officer TPS or Sr TPS? If the security officer was a TPS, and not certified to make apprehensions, hence (physical/law enforcement apprehensions) then that's a reason to get terminated; I've seen this before at my Target. Target's AP directives is specific and unrelentless.

Forget the clarification: I read commiecorvus link. Just egregious what happen to the AP team member.

He was an APS actually, it says plain clothes in the article.

This store is in my turf too. I'm familiar with their common practice of filing police reports on known theft reports. However that is against directives. An APS cannot seek out a warrant on his own. That has to be escalated to the Investigator, which will only happen if the subject becomes a market alert subject. This was a subject who just hit twice. Dallas should have contacted the Investigator prior to contacting police. Unfortunately the close relationship between the Leesburg Police and the Leesburg Target made it very easy for the information to be shared so quickly.

The main issue I have with this termination is that he was fired for doing things the way he had been doing them for years. Someone should have corrected him a long time ago instead of just firing him once a sensitive case came up.
 
Would you be able to clarify this case?

I'm not going to speak to much of AP, because of confidentiality but what was the position of the security officer TPS or Sr TPS? If the security officer was a TPS, and not certified to make apprehensions, hence (physical/law enforcement apprehensions) then that's a reason to get terminated; I've seen this before at my Target. Target's AP directives is specific and unrelentless.

Forget the clarification: I read commiecorvus link. Just egregious what happen to the AP team member.

He was an APS actually, it says plain clothes in the article.

This store is in my turf too. I'm familiar with their common practice of filing police reports on known theft reports. However that is against directives. An APS cannot seek out a warrant on his own. That has to be escalated to the Investigator, which will only happen if the subject becomes a market alert subject. This was a subject who just hit twice. Dallas should have contacted the Investigator prior to contacting police. Unfortunately the close relationship between the Leesburg Police and the Leesburg Target made it very easy for the information to be shared so quickly.

The main issue I have with this termination is that he was fired for doing things the way he had been doing them for years. Someone should have corrected him a long time ago instead of just firing him once a sensitive case came up.

That is the target way though. Cheat until caught, then lie and cover up you have stores cheating since they are understaffed to the point of you can't follow the rules.

He was fired for others mistakes I hope he takes spot to the cleaners..
 
That store is in my turf. I would suggest highly to fight it. I would start calling other etl's from other stores for starters. Based on info, looks ok.

I can't say it is in my turf, but I used to work at the Sam's in Sterling. Does that count? Is the store the Super that is up on the hill?
 
He was an APS actually, it says plain clothes in the article.

This store is in my turf too. I'm familiar with their common practice of filing police reports on known theft reports. However that is against directives. An APS cannot seek out a warrant on his own. That has to be escalated to the Investigator, which will only happen if the subject becomes a market alert subject. This was a subject who just hit twice. Dallas should have contacted the Investigator prior to contacting police. Unfortunately the close relationship between the Leesburg Police and the Leesburg Target made it very easy for the information to be shared so quickly.

The main issue I have with this termination is that he was fired for doing things the way he had been doing them for years. Someone should have corrected him a long time ago instead of just firing him once a sensitive case came up.

Interesting, when I was a Sr. TPS/ APS/ Sr. APS I would always file a police report on high amount KTR's. My APBP/ ETL-AP knew and had no problem. Does the AP Directives physically state not to file a police report when you observe all 5 steps for a KTR? I don't think so?

I filed numerous police reports of KTR's. And it was so much easier when I apprehended the subjects of KTR's since I already have a PD case # and a case on them.

Theres another reason for his termination, it just does not make sense to fire him for filing a police report for a KTR. If thats the case I should've been fired years ago :/
 
That store is in my turf. I would suggest highly to fight it. I would start calling other etl's from other stores for starters. Based on info, looks ok.

I can't say it is in my turf, but I used to work at the Sam's in Sterling. Does that count? Is the store the Super that is up on the hill?
No. Super t is in leesburg.
Is that near Bristow and Manassas? I was in that one just last week!
 
That store is in my turf. I would suggest highly to fight it. I would start calling other etl's from other stores for starters. Based on info, looks ok.

I can't say it is in my turf, but I used to work at the Sam's in Sterling. Does that count? Is the store the Super that is up on the hill?
No. Super t is in leesburg.
Is that near Bristow and Manassas? I was in that one just last week!
You are referring the Gainesville, super t. South of leesburg.
 
I have been in Leesburg. Useless fact: It's the closest ST for anyone in the Northeast.
 
Yeah, it's way too competitive up here for ST. Jersey/Philly area alone has ShopRite, Superfresh, Pathmark, Acme, Fresh Grocer, Stop and Shop, Weis, Giant, Foodtown, A&P, Wegman's, Whole Foods (probably missing a few others) as traditional full-service supermarker chains plus Aldi, Bottom Dollar, Sav-a-lot, Thiftway Shop n' Bag, etc as no-frills places. Too much loyalty to places here.
 
Yeah, it's way too competitive up here for ST. Jersey/Philly area alone has ShopRite, Superfresh, Pathmark, Acme, Fresh Grocer, Stop and Shop, Weis, Giant, Foodtown, A&P, Wegman's, Whole Foods (probably missing a few others) as traditional full-service supermarker chains plus Aldi, Bottom Dollar, Sav-a-lot, Thiftway Shop n' Bag, etc as no-frills places. Too much loyalty to places here.

Wow. In my area, we don't have nearly that many grocers, but we still have a bunch. Our main chains are Tops, Wegmans, Aldi, and Save-a-Lot, plus we have a lot of smaller local grocery stores which I won't name. We just got Trader Joe's near my plaza, and I heard we're supposed to be getting Whole Foods too.

There are at least three Walmart Supercenters near me that seem to do well, why not a Super Target?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top