Same as Hunter IIRC— they don’t want it back since its limited time.
Interesting it says REDcard holders receive an additional 30 days and not purchases made with a REDcard. Probably means very little to most but for someone who has a REDcard but doesn't use it, it could be significant.
I believe theymean paid with redcard. POS would deny it with another card.Interesting it says REDcard holders receive an additional 30 days and not purchases made with a REDcard. Probably means very little to most but for someone who has a REDcard but doesn't use it, it could be significant.
I'm absolutely sure that's what they meant, but it isn't what they said though so anyone could easily argue it to their benefit.I believe theymean paid with redcard. POS would deny it with another card.
No as the receipt will say return by XXX.I'm absolutely sure that's what they meant, but it isn't what they said though so anyone could easily argue it to their benefit.
The receipt says that with the original (non-extended) return date on anything I've ever bought even if I paid with a red card (which has always bothered me that it doesn't show the +30 days). So that would mean nothing at all, truly.No as the receipt will say return by XXX.
Well the issue becomes POS will outright deny the return “refund declined give merchandise back” leaving the only option to be a no receipt return on merch card (yes that can be overridden but I know my store wouldn’t).The receipt says that with the original (non-extended) return date on anything I've ever bought even if I paid with a red card (which has always bothered me that it doesn't show the +30 days). So that would mean nothing at all, truly.
It's arguable because of the wording used in the officially posted return policy as screenshotted above.
In the general return policy, it specifies the purchase must be made with the REDcard to receive the extra time. However this is a separately presented policy with its own REDcard 30 days extension policy that doesn't actually mention purchase method at all.
Nah. Target actually cares about the consumer facing tech so it’s usuallt reliable. If only they spent half as much time on ™ techBets on whether the Target.com website crashes?
And we know how well our guests keep their receipts.No as the receipt will say return by XXX.
I don't know how that went for you, but it was a complete success at our location. This one will be as well. I'm going for some cute whale logo stuff.I can see it going as good as the hunter collaboration went....
![]()
Target and vineyard vines Team Up on Limited-Edition Design Partnership
corporate.target.com
Their stuff isn’t cheap, but I don’t think it’s expensive enough for people to go to Target instead. If people want Vineyard Vines, they’ll get the real thing.
Now Lilly Pulitzer is a different story, their stuff is exorbitantly expensive.
No sorry! The product sold like crazy at my store I just mean the quality and availability. The overall sales were great but the launch and implementation was a flop. I think we were the only two store in the district to get it and we only had about 50% of what we were supposed to have due to all the women boots recall right before launch.I don't know how that went for you, but it was a complete success at our location. This one will be as well. I'm going for some cute whale logo stuff.
Specifically referring to hunter. Half the items were pulled and recalled two days before a major launch. I would call that a fail.I have to say I disagree.. I don’t really consider the past collabs as “failures” either as they did very strong in sales. Sure there may be things to prevent it from being a flawless launch which is probably what you’re looking for. Let’s be honest brand launches are tricky but those are minor issues that I wouldn’t say make the collab “fail”. I don’t think it’s fair to speak poorly about it before it even launches.
As (poorly) written: It's an explicitly, separately stated return policy for the one line of products. By simply saying the standard return policy applies, then you could ignore the 14 vs 90 days too as that part doesn't match the standard policy either. See how that just doesn't work?